<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the money in the meta-data?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nick.piggott.name/blog/2009/10/24/is-the-money-in-the-meta-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nick.piggott.name/blog/2009/10/24/is-the-money-in-the-meta-data/</link>
	<description>Nick Piggott's blog about the intersection between new media and radio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:27:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phill Clark</title>
		<link>http://nick.piggott.name/blog/2009/10/24/is-the-money-in-the-meta-data/comment-page-1/#comment-10243</link>
		<dc:creator>Phill Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.piggott.name/blog/?p=175#comment-10243</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d agree totally with the concept of &#039;Control&#039;. We have no issues as a business with this content being used, however it would be nice to be able to control a clean feed for this data rather that it rely on scraping pages or scripts which weren&#039;t designed to have this done to them.

Personally, I  believe that if it remains a free service with no adverts or ecommerce options then why not, in fact I&#039;d love to see and API from the service soon so more mashup concepts can be created from all the data and analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree totally with the concept of &#8216;Control&#8217;. We have no issues as a business with this content being used, however it would be nice to be able to control a clean feed for this data rather that it rely on scraping pages or scripts which weren&#8217;t designed to have this done to them.</p>
<p>Personally, I  believe that if it remains a free service with no adverts or ecommerce options then why not, in fact I&#8217;d love to see and API from the service soon so more mashup concepts can be created from all the data and analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Webster</title>
		<link>http://nick.piggott.name/blog/2009/10/24/is-the-money-in-the-meta-data/comment-page-1/#comment-10230</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.piggott.name/blog/?p=175#comment-10230</guid>
		<description>The reason stated by Bauer could be read to suggest that once they have fixed their meta-data so that it accurately reflects their content then it would become available for such mash-ups again. Will be interesting to see.

I had not realised that last.fm was being used as the repository for the data. Were they aware that they are holding potentially contentious data?
I know that a few stations do submit their own tracklistings there - so maybe OGS could open up their comparison to all such stations - and also allow last.fm users to compare their own profile with stations - then it starts to be a more useful service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason stated by Bauer could be read to suggest that once they have fixed their meta-data so that it accurately reflects their content then it would become available for such mash-ups again. Will be interesting to see.</p>
<p>I had not realised that last.fm was being used as the repository for the data. Were they aware that they are holding potentially contentious data?<br />
I know that a few stations do submit their own tracklistings there &#8211; so maybe OGS could open up their comparison to all such stations &#8211; and also allow last.fm users to compare their own profile with stations &#8211; then it starts to be a more useful service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://nick.piggott.name/blog/2009/10/24/is-the-money-in-the-meta-data/comment-page-1/#comment-10210</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.piggott.name/blog/?p=175#comment-10210</guid>
		<description>A recent courtcase in Australia ruled that future TV programme listings are not protected by copyright. 
( http://bit.ly/obs0Z ) 

It would be interesting to see what the verdict would be in the UK if Radio stations tested whether past track listings are protectable by copyright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent courtcase in Australia ruled that future TV programme listings are not protected by copyright.<br />
( <a href="http://bit.ly/obs0Z" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/obs0Z</a> ) </p>
<p>It would be interesting to see what the verdict would be in the UK if Radio stations tested whether past track listings are protectable by copyright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
